Without any doubt, the emergence of numerous blockchain service providers has created healthy competition within the industry. Apparently, most of these blockchains, including Algorand and Cardano, run to solve similar problems in the virtual space. This development has, over time, availed grounds for developers and other users to do serial comparisons. Now, the algorand vs cardano comparison will be done in a bid to discern the platform that offers the best services between the two.
Although, findings reveal that both blockchains have, in recent times, remained at the forefront of web3 development. They avail high-performance blockchain supports to builders of crypto projects and applications. Accordingly, this article will carefully assess functionalities (speed, security, scalability), projects, similarities, and differences to do the algorand vs cardano comparison.
Algorand vs Cardano: Overviews
Cardano
To begin the Algorand vs Cardano comparison, it is grossly important to carefully review both blockchains. Starting with Cardano, it functions as a decentralized proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain. More so, the blockchain possesses remarkable scalability, interoperability, and a host of other laudable attributes. Notably, the Cardano blockchain runs as a third-generation network, serving as an alternative to Ethereum.
Additionally, Cardano is powered by a consensus mechanism called Ouroboros. The mechanism was remarkably designed to lessen the cost implications of energy needed for proof-of-work mining. It eliminates the burdensome computing resources usable by the proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm. According to findings, the development itinerary of Cardano manifested in five stages.
As revealed, each of the stages became named after renowned mathematicians and scientists. They include Byron, Shelley, Goguen, Basho, and Voltaire. Worth noting that Cardano, in the past year, executed smart contract support to enhance its scalability and use cases for subscribers. This development paved the way for subscribers to initiate smart contracts and NFTs and administrate numerous assets.
Despite the prevailing market conditions, Cardano has continued to enjoy a persistent rise in transaction volume. Last June, it recorded a 5% increment in transactional activities compared to May. Additionally, the ecosystem recorded about 44.8 million different activities from May to June.
Cardano’s native token
Cardano possesses a native token, identified as ADA. The network uses the native token to reward participants or nodes in the blockchain’s staking pool. More so, ADA serves as a medium of payment made for computational gas fees on the network. It possesses a circulating supply of 34 billion ADA coins and a total supply of 45 billion.
Additionally, ADA addresses skyrocketed, attaining about 3.42 million. The overall success also resulted in a massive increase in assets on the blockchain. There are about 5.4 million native assets on the Cardano blockchain.
Algorand
In a bid to further the algorand vs cardano comparison, the former will also be thoroughly overviewed. Reportedly, Algorand, just like Cardano, functions as an open-source and decentralized blockchain. Notably, the blockchain is renowned for its seed, scalability, and security. Designed as a permissionless network, Algorand allows all developers to build their projects on it with ease.
As of today, the blockchain network possesses the capacity to host and provide speed, security and scalability to varieties of decentralized projects. Algorand has continued to serve as a direct alternative to Ethereum as it offers lesser gas fees. Additionally, Algorand employs Proof-of-Stake consensus. It reportedly circulates incentives to holders of its native token. It usually processes about 1,000 transactions per second. Furthermore, Algorand enables builders to access a mechanism identified as Algorand Standard Asset. This mechanism helps them to initiate new tokens. Similarly, it allows them to relay existing tokens to the Algorand network.
Algorand’s native token
Just like Cardano, Algorand possesses a native token called ALGO. This token serves as the instrument for operations on the blockchain. Reportedly, the blockchain usually divide validators incentives for all holders of ALGON. The token currently has a supply cap of 10 billion coins, with 3 billion intended for circulation for the next five years.
Algorand vs Cardano: Projects
The Algorand vs Cardano comparison also necessitates the need to highlight the projects built on them. As of today, there are numerous Dapp projects running on the Algorand and Cardano blockchains. Some of the projects running on Cardano include, Ardana, Meld, Empowa, World Mobile Token, Rayswap, Liqwid finance, Adax, and others. Notably, the projects on Algorand are IDEX, Republic, Meld, Yieldly, Dust Identity, Planet Watch, Orion protocol and others.
Algorand vs Cardano: Similarities
The Alogrand vs Cardano comparison is a contention that addresses different ecosystems with vast differences. Without a doubt, there are few similarities between this two, though they employ both PoS. Yet, they come in different and distinctive approaches, which are synonymous with their respective ecosystems.
The significant similarities in the Alogrand Vs Cardano contest is that they both employ the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. Within this similarity, there are prominent differences that make their respective employment of PoS different. Above all, both can still be regarded as the same despite this difference.
With their employment of the Proof-Of-Stake mechanism, Algorand and Cardano do not use power-consuming gadgets to mine new tokens. This implies that they differ from blockchains like Bitcoin, which uses the PoW to produce new tokens. Similarly, the two ecosystems under view are not power-consuming, and they are climate-friendly.
Just like every other ecosystem, in the Alogrand Vs Cardano comparison, the two blockchains tend to tackle the same problems. The major issue blockchain has battled over the rotates around gas fees, speed, limitations, and total decentralization. Though other prominent blockchains are working to tackle this issue, but Algorand and Cardano have pushed up their efforts in a practical pursuit.
Therefore, it’s fair to say that In their attempt, both Algorand and Cardano are designed to tackle these issues. Though, Algorand’s design focuses more on the security of its blockchain, the bandwidth, and transaction time.
Algorand vs Cardano: Differences based on compatibility with other blockchains
As we proceed further in this comparison of Algorand Vs Cardano, it’s imperative to note that both run on different independent blockchains. Algorand is an independent blockchain with the native token ALGO. On the other side, Cardano is based Ouroboros blockchain with its native token ADA.
Another notable difference in this contest of Algorand Vs Cardano is their compatibility with other blockchains. Lately, Algorand has been struggling to attract liquidity to its ecosystem, despite offering low gas fees and swift processing of transactions. To tackle that deficiency, the Alogrand foundation attained a $10M grant to Applied Blockchain to develop the London Bridge. The London Brigde aims to set up the compatibility of Ethereum with Algorand.
With the Bridge, Alogrand would be attached to the DApps on Ethereum; note that Ethereum has the largest Ecosystem at the moment. Consequently, Alogrand will have access to these applications and gain more liquidity. On a long-term plan, the Alogrand Foundation is planning to integrate a feature that will allow the verification of other chains on the Alogrand smart contracts. According to the foundation, it will manifest by integrating state proofs in the form of compact certificates into Alogrand’s consensus.
Algorand vs Cardano: Flexibility
Cardano Compatibility with Ethereum and other blockchains is quite different from Alogrand’s. Their compatibility with others strongly dominates the Algorand Vs Cardano discussion. In this aspect, Cardano has more flexibility and a wide range of compatibility with other blockchains.
Further, Milkomeda, a prominent sidechain protocol, supports Cardano and enables EVM-compatible smart contracts to be initiated on Mikomeda. Recently, the sideshain protocol revealed a plan to establish interoperability between Cardano and other prominent blockchains. This year, another decentralized interoperability outlet identified as Wanchain initiated a cross-chain bridge that links Cardano to another Layer 1 blockchain. As revealed, the bridge is noncustodial and bi-directional, which will focus on utilizing Cardano as a Layer 2 blockchain.
Last month, the Cardano IOHK released the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) sidechain alpha on testnet. According to the announcement, the permissionless sidechain aids developers in writing Solidity smart contracts on Cardano. Thus, helping them to create EVM-compatible solutions and ERC20-compatible tokens while they benefit from the remarkable characteristics of the Cardano blockchain.
Without a doubt, Cardano has a feasible advantage over Algorand in this aspect of Algorand vs Cardano comparison. The level of Cardano’s compatibility with other blockchains is above Alogrand’s.
Differences base implementation of Proof of Stake Mechanism
As earlier stated that the two Ecosystems under view both run the Proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. Yet, their method of deployment differs, with the Ouroboros Cardano is one of the early adopters of the proof-of-stake protocols. Cardano with the Ouroboros Chain, processes transaction blocks by splitting chains into epochs that are further split into time slots. One of the notable characteristic features of the Ouroboros Blockchain is that it embraces a less-energy consuming mechanism to confirm blocks. Notably, its two-layer core layout makes the mining of its natibe token, ADA more productive than other tokens.
Meanwhile, Alogrand runs a new dimension to the Proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. This dimension further distinguishes it from its fellow competitor in the Alogrand Vs Cardano discussion. The Alogrand team introduced Pixel into its consensus mechanism against posterior corruptions. According to the team, posterior corruption poses a threat to the designs of the PoS. The team believes that building efficient and safe virtual signatures within PoS-based blockchains will effectively minimize bandwidth, space, and program criteria from nodes. With that, the team believes it will see the development of more efficient applications.
Alogrand’s pixel runs as a pair-oriented forward-secure initiative with numerous signatures designed for blockchains. It helps achieve attain a sizeable reduction in bandwidth, consensus effort, and storage requirement. Pixel signatures comprises of two group elements that can be verified using signatures without considering the number of available validators.
Algorand vs Cardano: Comparison base of the position of their native tokens
Additionally, another notable theme of the Algorand Vs Cardano comparison is the strength and situation of their native tokens. The market cap of ALGO and ADA stands at $2,484,883,924.82 and $17,936,130,965.06 respectively. Considering this figure, it’s safe to say that Cardano’s native coin, ADA, is doing well than ALGO at the moment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Algorand Vs Cardano comparison is indeed an interesting one. Obviously, the two Ecosystems have strengths and weaknesses that make them unique in their own way. However, after a stern analysis and comparison of notable factors, it’s safe to say that Cardano is well-established and more prominent than Algorand. Still, this position doesn’t make one inferior to the other because developers can utilize them based on their personal preferences and get the desired result.
Read More