Without any doubt, the growing exploration of the digital space has continued to bring about numerous innovations. Some of these innovations include metaverse, NFTs, Blockchains, and a host of others, paving the way for virtual games and their assets to thrive. Today, there are hundreds of virtual gaming projects, availing users with pleasurable experiences and opportunities to earn passively.
Certainly, some of these innovative projects include Axie Infinity (AXS) and Sandbox. According to findings, both gaming projects are renowned and have continued to enjoy the patronage and loyalty of gamers. Indeed, the successes recorded so far by these projects had, in recent times, instigated an AXS vs Sandbox debate, particularly among their adopters. Accordingly, this article intends to reasonably carry out the AXS vs Sandbox discourse in a bid to balance their functionalities, similarities, deficiencies, and differences.
AXS vs Sandbox: General overview
In an attempt to do an AXS vs sandbox debate, it is essential to fully appraise the functionalities of the latter. Founded in 2011, Sandbox emanated as a reality virtual world powered on the Ethereum blockchain. In 2017, the space became upgraded to a 3 dimensional gaming project. As designed, Sandbox creates a platform for users to initiate, own, play and monetize all their experiences and innovations in the virtual arena. It typically runs as a play-to-earn gaming platform to avail best gaming experiences to gamers.
Furthermore, Sandbox has continued to empower creators, builders and a host of others through its consistent partnerships and sponsorships. Now, the project has advanced to allow for the exploration of Non-fungible tokens and DAOs as measures towards aiding players. Just like others, sandbox has a native utility token, identified as SAND. The SAND is usually employed in buying NFTs and collectibles on the platform.
Techniques on Sandbox
Voxedit remains one of the notable techniques on Sandbox. With Voxedit, users create their NFT collection easily. It functions as a 3-dimensional platform, allowing subscribers to animate 3D creations, including animals, humans, equipments among others. Users can easily migrate their creations when done to the sandbox marketplace.
More so, the Sandbox metaverse possesses a marketplace. This marketplace allows users to easily upload their NFT collections created through Voxedit. To do this, creators need to first, upload their NFTs into a network called IPFS. This, as discovered, helps to avail a decentralized repository for the tokens. Afterward, creators usually register with the blockchain. This consequently enable them to verify the ownership of the NFT.
Here, the Game maker allows creators to invent 3-dimensional games without incurring any cost. This tool does not necessitate users to possess deep knowledge of coding to improvise games. This posture gives gamers a decentralized power to invent and design their preferred feature, structure, and outlay of their space.
Sandbox’s native token
To further the AXS vs Sandbox debate, it is essential to examine the token of the latter. Notably, Sandbox posseses a native token, SAND. It runs as an ERC-20 token. This token serves as a gaming token in the ecosystem, aiding all transactions and interactions on the network. Reportedly, it possesses a circulating supply of 1.3 billion coins and a total supply of 3 billion. Other tokens which run on Sandbox includes Assets and Lands. Assets, for instance, runs as an ERC-1155 token, traded on the platform’s marketplace. More so, Land functions as an ERC-721 token. Sandbox users usually purchase Land in a bid to explore it in their games, assets, and interactive exposures.
Axie Infinity (AXS)
To further the AXS vs Sandbox debate, it is now imperative to explain the former. Notably, AXS is the native token of Axie Infinity. It runs as “an open-ended flexible gaming universe.” Axie Infinity runs on the Ronin Network, a sidechain developed by Sky Mavis. As a Blockchain game, Axie Infinity usually invite players to collect, breed, battle and trade digital creatures, identified as Axies. Notably, each of the Axies are distinctive and can be developed to create more Axies. However, each Axie can only be bred seven times.
Worth noting that the Axie Infinity in-game world is called Lunacia. As designed, Lunacia posseses over 50,000 plots of virtual lands. According to reports, these lands run as NFT, thereby open to trading by gamers. Generally, Axie Infinity runs to allow its community of players contribute to the in-game universe. This, as designed, will be done when they participate in the governance and by availing “player-generated content.”
Today, Axie Infinity appears renowned as a leading figure in the NFT gaming sphere. This, as reported, manifested owing to the fact that its in-game digital assets seems represented by NFTs. The players reportedly trade the token on its marketplace for real money.
AXS as Axie Infinity native token
As revealed, the AXS remains the native token of Axie Infinity. It runs as an ERC-20 governance token for the Axie Universe. As designed, the token serves as an instrument through which gamers get rewards. Generally, AXS powers every transaction unfolding on the network. Also, some players stake with AXS while some hold the token just to participate in key governance votes.
In the AXS vs Sandbox comparison, the usefulness of the two native tokens, AXS and SAND are essential to address. The two tokens are the governance token of the Decentralized Autonomous Organization of both Axie Infinity and Sandbox. This implies that holders of the two tokens are eligible to contribute to issues regarding their ecosystems.
AXS vs Sandbox: Similarities
AXS vs Sandbox shares certain similarities based on their structure. One of the notable similarities between the two projects remains that they run as Metaverse-oriented projects. AXS vs Sandbox has powerful virtual reality features, which have contributed massively to their popularity among lovers of Metaverse and Web 3.0. Similarly, AXS vs Sandbox both sell out portions of land to users. Though the two projects allow the use of these portions of land differently, yet it’s a noticeable feature one cannot take away from the AXS vs Sandbox comparison.
On Axie infinity, gamers enjoy the right to buy a portion of lands referred to as Homeland for their Axies. The Homeland is also known as Lunacia, and it’s divided into 90,601 plots. These plots run as ERC-721 tokens, and they serve as homes for Axies. On Sandbox, users can use their portions of land for a variety of things. They can acquire lands to build estates, office space, events, malls, and others.
Also, the Native token remains another prominent thematic feature in the AXS vs Sandbox comparison. AXS runs as the native token of Axie Infinity, just as SAND works as Sandbox’s native token. Users can use the tokens to purchase items within the two metaverse spaces, and they can be invested in like other tokens in the cryptocurrency space. Notably, both AXS and SAND are based on the Ethereum blockchain, they are ERC-20 tokens. While they share fascinating similarities, the AXS vs Sandbox has loads of differences between them.
AXS vs Sandbox: Differences
Despite having interesting similarities, the two projects in the AXS vs Sandbox comparison posseses distinctive differences that are well known. First, it’s imperative to note that the AXS is the native token of Axie Infinity. At the same time, Sandbox is a metaverse-oriented platform. Both many investors and game lovers often regard Axie Infinity as AXS while comparing the two projects side by side.
Though they run as metaverse-oriented projects, nonetheless, Axie infinity is purely a play-to-earn game. Sandbox at the other end cuts across all sectors. Users can utilize potions of lands on the platform for numerous uses. This implies that Sandbox goes beyond the gaming experience. Nevertheless, Sandbox is famous as a play-to-earn game but it doesn’t contain action gaming features like Axie Infinity. The creators of Sandbox intended to use the platform to introduce blockchain technology into the gaming world and it has done well in fulfilling that task.
On Axie Infinity, Axies are paired as a team to battle other groups of Axies. Each Axies has its distinctive features that reflect its contributions to each battle. After a battle, the winning team becomes awarded with AXS as a reward. On Sandbox, they are no in-built battling rounds or fight arenas, the rewards depend on how creative users can commercialize their portions of land.
It’s actually unfair to compare the two projects together. Both Axie Infinity and Sandbox in the AXS vs Sandbox comparison have their weaknesses and strengths. They have a different targeted audience, and their utilization differs. So, every user will find the two projects useful according to their preferences. This implies that one isn’t superior to the other, and they have their respective features that make them standout among their peers.
Above all, the two projects gives gamers a shift away from the regular Web 2.0 game structure that doesn’t yield any return. Now, gamers are rewarded based on their passion, creativity and passion to the game. Without a doubt, the AXS vs Sandbox comparison is expository in content as it highlights the advancement of Web 3.0 games initiative.